Key Insights
Nuclear weapons have evolved from war prevention tools to “conquest enablement instruments,” with China’s rapid arsenal expansion designed to paralyse US intervention over Taiwan
America’s nuclear modernisation proves strategically incoherent – developing weapons systems that cannot be credibly deployed against hardened adversary targets
Democratic leaders face impossible escalation choices that authoritarian rulers exploit, turning Western nuclear consciousness into strategic vulnerability
Alliance credibility collapses as extended deterrence proves worthless against nuclear coercion, driving proliferation amongst US partners
Analysis
Consider this scenario: Chinese missiles streak across the Taiwan Strait in 2027, overwhelming Taipei’s air defences as amphibious forces race toward the beaches. In Washington, generals brief the president on response options whilst Beijing’s ambassador delivers a crisp message – any American intervention risks nuclear escalation that could reach the continental United States. The president hesitates. The invasion succeeds. Nuclear deterrence worked perfectly – just not for America.
This represents the most dangerous strategic transformation since Hiroshima: nuclear weapons no longer prevent wars between great powers.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to 7 THINGS to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.